Since the connection between NATHA yoga center and M.I.S.A was considered by the lousy journalists as a stain on NATHA’s reputation, here is how the M.I.S.A case was perceived at European level. I have to mention that none of these video clips were presented in Romania. They were filmed by an independent film producer who at that time was making an investigation regarding the M.I.S.A case. You can see for yourself the difference between the perception of some serious people who form their opinion after investigating and the slanderous proffered by the media.
Sooner or later the TRUTH will prevail…
Dear Mihai,
thank you for posting this film document. I find it very inspiring to see the whole situation from the point of view of these experts, especially in their honest and straight forward way of putting the things: eg. as Jens Peter Bonde points out, it is not a crime to be different than the majority nor is it to do voluntary work. In order to accuse someone, you have to show that he has comitted a crime. It is obvious, but evidently it is not neccessary in the Romanian juridical system, still very much following the same totalitarian style as under Ceaucescu, as presented in the clips. Living in a very nicely organized democratic society like Denmark or Germany, it is hard to imagine such a shameless injustice. Of course also we here about corruptions of many of our politcians, but this case is too far beyond our level of daily familiarity with injustice in the system. We can only stay amazed, as Ulla Sandbaek. That’s why it has to be pointed out: These trials against Gregorian Bivolaru and other members of MISA in Romania are staged, there are no true bases for the accusations.
Especially, in this time, when also Natha is attacked by the papers in the sphere of Jyllands Posten, it is illustrating very well Natha’s answer to the infamous articles:
Comparing the articles with the statements in the clips, it becomes even more clear, that in the press campaign (obviously, the articles are not appearing merely coincidencial one after the other, but as a campaign) arbitrary accusations and staged processes in the dubious juridical system are presented as proven facts. Fortunately until now in Denmark the campaign only happened in the press, and not in the court, giving us hope that the Danish juridical system is more much safe against corruption.
Thank you
Rainer